Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/43718/2026 of HARMAN PIYARA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 10 September 2026
COURT (210 ) HARMAN PIYARA STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Himmat Singh Deol, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya
CRM-M-43718
IN THE H
HARMAN PIY
STATE OF PU
CORAM: HO
Present:
Mr
Ms
MANISHA BA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Th Bharatiya Nag petitioner seek registered unde Nyaya Sanhita, District Fazilka
2. Vi petitioner was investigation.
8-2026 (O&M)
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH
CR
D YARA
Versus UNJAB
ON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MAN
r. Himmat Singh Deol, Advocate
s. Sakshi Bakshi, Assistant Advo **** ATRA, J. (ORAL) hrough the instant petition u garik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ks anticipatory bail in case FIR er Sections 333, 118(1), 115(2) , 2023 (for short “BNS”) at Po a. de order dated 07.08.2026 p released on interim bail a
AND HARYANA AT RM-M-43718-2026 (O&M) ate of decision : 10.09.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondent NISHA BATRA e for the petitioner ocate General, Punjab under Section 482 of the (for short ‘BNSS’), the R No.58 dated 20.05.2026 ), 190, 191(3) of Bharatiya olice Station Sadar Abohar, passed by this Court, the and was directed to join AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRM-M-43718
3. Le and on instructi 14.08.2026 and
4. In investigation an is not required observed that a the petitioner. 07.08.2026 gran to compliance o
5. Sin application, if a
10.09.2026 Amit Sharma 8-2026 (O&M)
earned State counsel has filed st ions states that the petitioner has d his custodial interrogation is no view of the fact that the petiti nd given the nature of allegation
d. As such, without commentin a case for grant of anticipatory b Accordingly, the petition is al nting interim bail to the petition of conditions laid down in Sectio nce the main petition has b any, is rendered infructuous. (M Whether speaking/reasoned:- Y Whether reportable:- Yes/No
tatus report date 09.09.2026 s joined the investigation on ot required. ioner has already joined the ns, his pre-trial incarceration ng on merits of case, it is bail is made out in favour of llowed and the order dated ner is made absolute, subject on 482(2) of BNSS. been disposed of, pending MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.