CWP/29401/2026 of KAMALJEET KAUR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER on 10 September 2026

IN T

Kamaljee

State of H

CORAM

Present:-

NIDHI G

in the nat services o them, as the judgm vs. Union alongwith

2. petitioner Accounta petitioner dated 29. CWP-29401-2026 (O & M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGA

CWP No.29401

Date of decision et Kaur and another Versus Haryana and another M:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE N

Mr. Sandeep Antehri, Advoc for the petitioners.

Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Ha GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ pet ture of mandamus directing the r of the petitioners on their posts they complete more than 14 ye ment passed by Hon’ble Apex C n of India and others” reported as h all consequential benefits. It is inter alia submitted b rs that petitioner No.1 was ant Assistant vide order dated 27 r No.2 was appointed on the po .6.2012 in the respondent-Depa

JAB AND HARYANA ARH 1 of 2026 (O & M) n :-10.09.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA cate aryana. tition is for issuance of a writ respondents to regularize the s of Accountant, manned by ears of service in the light of Court in case titled as “Jaggo s 2024 SCC Online SC 3826, by learned counsel for the appointed on the post of 7.2.2012 (Annexure P-1); and ost of Accountant vide order artment under the Integrated VIJAY ASIJA

Child Pro promoted submitted to time (Annexur petitioner of the res that accor petitioner by Hon’b and other the petiti (Annexur the respon a directio petition a passing a down by t

3.

4. behalf of the limite stage, is petitioner CWP-29401-2026 (O & M) otection Scheme (ICPS). Subse d to the post of Accountant vide d that the services of the petition vide several letters includin res S-2 and P-2A). Learned rs have worked regularly and con spondent-Department from 2012 rdingly having rendered more th rs are liable to be regularized in t ble Apex Court in case titled as rs” reported as 2024 SCC Onlin ioners have submitted a repr re P-5), however, no response th ndent-Department. It is accordi on be issued to the responden as a representation and decide th speaking order in a time bound the Hon’ble Apex Court in Jagg Notice of motion. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, respondents and submits that h ed prayer made by learned coun accepted. It is also submitted th rs needs to be ascertained as to quently, petitioner No.1 was order dated 21.10.2020. It is ners were extended from time ng letter dated 21.5.2025 d counsel submits that the ntinuously to the satisfaction 2 till dated. It is submitted han 10 years of services, the terms of the judgment passed s “Jaggo vs. Union of India ne SC 3826. In this regard, resentation dated 29.3.2026 ereto has been received from ngly prayed that accordingly nts to treat the present writ he case of the petitioners by d manner, in view of law laid go’s case (supra). Haryana, accepts notice on he has ‘no objection’ in case, nsel for the petitioners at this hat the service tenure of the whether they have rendered VIJAY ASIJA

continuou regulariza

5. going into with a dir to treat th consider a passing a within a p copy of t the Hon’b

6. Septembe Vijay Asija

Whether spe Whether Rep

CWP-29401-2026 (O & M) us and satisfactory service t ation. After hearing learned couns o the merits of the present petitio rection to the respondents/Comp he present writ petition as a re and decide the claim of the petit a speaking and reasoned order period of 04 months from the d this order, while keeping in min ble Apex Court in Jaggo’s case ( Pending application(s) if any er 10, 2026

eaking/reasoned Yes / No portable Yes / No to make him eligible for sel for the parties, without on, the same is disposed of etent Authority, concerned, epresentation and forthwith tioners for regularization by r, in accordance with law, date of receipt of a certified nd the judgment passed by (supra). y also stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA )

JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA