Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/43755/2026 of SERAMIR SINGH AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (211 ) SERAMIR SINGH AND OTHER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition under

CRM-M-43755

IN THE H

SERAMIR SIN

STATE OF PU

CORAM: HO

Present:

Mr

Ms

MANISHA BA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Th Bharatiya Nag petitioners seek registered unde (for short “BNS

2. Vi petitioners wer investigation.

3. Le have joined interrogation is 5-2026 (O&M)

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH

CR

D NGH AND OTHERS

Versus UNJAB

ON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MAN

r. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the

s. Sakshi Bakshi, Assistant Advo **** ATRA, J. (ORAL) hrough the instant petition u garik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ks anticipatory bail in case FI er Sections 331(4), 305 of Bhar S”) at Police Station Valtoha, Dis de order dated 10.08.2026 p re released on interim bail earned State counsel on instructio the investigation on 20.08.2 not required.

AND HARYANA AT RM-M-43755-2026 (O&M) ate of decision : 10.09.2026 ... Petitioners

...Respondent NISHA BATRA e petitioners ocate General, Punjab under Section 482 of the (for short ‘BNSS’), the IR No.82 dated 30.09.2024 ratiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 strict Tarn Taran. passed by this Court, the and was directed to join ons states that the petitioners 2026 and their custodial AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M-43755

4. In investigation a incarceration is case, it is obser favour of the pe dated 10.08.202 subject to comp

5. Sin application, if a

10.09.2026 Amit Sharma 5-2026 (O&M)

view of the fact that the petition and given the nature of a s not required. As such, withou rved that a case for grant of anti etitioners. Accordingly, the petit 26 granting interim bail to the p pliance of conditions laid down i nce the main petition has b any, is rendered infructuous. (M Whether speaking/reasoned:- Y Whether reportable:- Yes/No

ners have already joined the allegations, their pre-trial ut commenting on merits of icipatory bail is made out in tion is allowed and the order petitioners is made absolute, n Section 482(2) of BNSS. been disposed of, pending MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead