Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/11043/2026 of KAURA KAUR AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.11043 of 2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 Kaura Kaur and another …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT Present :- Ms. Dimple Rani, Advocate for the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.11043 of 2026
Date of decision: 10.09.2026
Kaura Kaur and another
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT
Present :-
Ms. Dimple Rani, Advocate
for the petitioners.
*****
N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J.(Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also direct the respondents No. 4 to 6 not to interfere in their lives and liberty.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 07.09.2026 (Annexure P-5) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, and she shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their aforesaid representation.
3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. SEEMA SHARMA 2026.09.10 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP No.11043 of 2026
6. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2- the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the matter and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law.
7. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any.
8. With these observations, this petition is disposed of.
(N.S. SHEKHAWAT) 10.09.2026
JUDGE seema Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No
SEEMA SHARMA 2026.09.10 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document