Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/40411/2026 of RAVINDER DAGAR ALIAS KALLI Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 10 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (204) RAVINDER DAGAR ALIAS KALLI STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana Mr. Nazim Khilluka, Advocate for the MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant
CRM-M-40411
IN THE H
RAVINDER D
STATE OF HA
CORAM: HO
Present:
Mr
Mr
Mr
MANISHA BA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Th Bharatiya Nag petitioner seek registered unde Nyaya Sanhita, Palwal.
2. Vi petitioner was investigation.
1-2026 (O&M)
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH
CR
D DAGAR ALIAS KALLI
Versus ARYANA
ON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MAN
r. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for th
r. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana
r. Nazim Khilluka, Advocate for **** ATRA, J. (ORAL) hrough the instant petition u garik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s anticipatory bail in case FIR er Sections 231, 233, 221, 125 2023 (for short “BNS”) at Poli de order dated 03.08.2026 p released on interim bail a
AND HARYANA AT RM-M-40411-2026 (O&M) ate of decision : 10.09.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondent NISHA BATRA e petitioner a r the complainant under Section 482 of the (for short ‘BNSS’), the R No.207 dated 10.06.2026 5, 238, 61(2) of Bharatiya ice Station Gadpuri, District passed by this Court, the and was directed to join AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRM-M-40411
3. Le on instructions 13.08.2026 and
4. Le allegations agai custodial interro
5. Th counsel for the
6. In investigation an is not required observed that a the petitioner. 03.08.2026 gran to compliance o
7. Sin application, if a
10.09.2026 Amit Sharma 1-2026 (O&M)
earned State counsel filed status states that the petitioner has d the custodial interrogation of th earned counsel for the compla inst the petitioner are serious an ogation of the petitioner is must. his Court has heard the rival su parties. view of the fact that the petiti nd given the nature of allegation
d. As such, without commentin a case for grant of anticipatory b Accordingly, the petition is al nting interim bail to the petition of conditions laid down in Sectio nce the main petition has b any, is rendered infructuous. (M Whether speaking/reasoned:- Y Whether reportable:- Yes/No
report dated 09.09.2026 and joined the investigation on he petitioner is not required. ainant has argued that the nd specific in nature and the
ubmissions made by learned ioner has already joined the ns, his pre-trial incarceration ng on merits of case, it is bail is made out in favour of llowed and the order dated ner is made absolute, subject on 482(2) of BNSS. been disposed of, pending MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.