Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/23307/2026 of DHARAM SINGH Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-23307-2026 Date of decision : 10.09.2026 Dharam Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: Mr. Rajender Singh Malik,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
***
CWP-23307-2026
Date of decision : 10.09.2026
Dharam Singh
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA
Present:
Mr. Rajender Singh Malik, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl.A.G. Haryana.
Mr. Vikas Kumar Sharma, Advocate for
Mr.Anil Dutt, Advocate
for respondents no.9, 10, 11 and 14.
VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. On 03.08.2026, this Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Present: Mr. Rajender Singh Malik, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Inter alia contends that against the private respondents and other persons, eviction order was passed on 31.01.2019 which was upheld on 16.06.2022 and as per the instructions of the petitioner, no further challenge has been made to the same. It is further submitted that in the eviction proceedings, the private respondents had given a statement to leave the premises within ten days by 30.06.2025 and in spite of the same, they have not left the premises. DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 10:05 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment
Notice of motion.
Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5.
Liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve private respondents No.6 to 18 through dasti process also.
Adjourned to 24.08.2026.
To be taken up after the urgent list. August 3rd, 2026”
2. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the possession was taken and given to the Gram Panchayat.
3. Learned counsel for respondents no.9,10, 11 and 14 has further submitted that even their houses have been demolished and possession has been given to the Gram Panchayat.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the same, the present petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
5. Ordered accordingly.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE
(DIVYA SHARMA)
JUDGE September 10, 2026. Davinder Kumar
Whether speaking / reasoned
Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No
DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 10:05 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment