Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/11016/2026 of PRIYA DEV AIND ANR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on 10 September 2026

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH 119 CRWP-11016-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026 PRIYA DEVI AND ANR …Petitioners V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Ajay

CRWP-11016-2026(O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

CHANDIGARH

119

CRWP-11016-2026(O&M)

Date of decision: 10.09.2026

PRIYA DEVI AND ANR

…Petitioners

V/S

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL

Present:

Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana.

****

SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.(ORAL)

1. Apprehending danger to their life and liberty, both petitioners who are in live-in relationship have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct official respondents to protect their life and liberty from respondents No.4 to 6.

2.

Page 1 of 3

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both petitioners are major, petitioner No.1 was born on 28.04.1994 and petitioner No.2 on 13.03.1993. Petitioner No.1 was married and had two children, while petitioner No.2 was unmarried. It is further submitted that both petitioners had developed an emotional bond and started living together. Respondents No.4 to 6 were unhappy with the relationship and were extending threats to eliminate the petitioners. Petitioners moved representation to respondents No.2 for protection of their life and liberty but to no avail. JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-11016-2026(O&M) 2

3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.

4. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.

5. Heard.

6. Life and liberty of petitioners has to be protected irrespective of the fact that their relationship does not have approval of society.

7. Without commenting on the validity of relationship of the petitioners, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the official respondents to decide representation dated 06.09.2026 (Annexure P-3) within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the lives and liberty of the petitioners, necessary steps as per law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.

8.

Page 2 of 3

However, this order shall neither validate the live-in- status between the petitioners nor shall have any bearing or any civil or criminal action, initiated or to be initiated against them.

9. Disposed of accordingly.

All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 10.09.2026

JUDGE Jyoti-V

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No JYOTI 2026.09.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead