Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/28464/2026 of RAM GANESH Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 119 RAM GANESH STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Ist ACP w.e.f. 01.01.2013, instead of service rendered by him in the Sugar Mill, based Appeal No.4446 of 2008, titled as ‘ Deepak Sood and others’ which
IN T
RAM GAN
STATE OF
CORAM: H
Present :
AMAN CH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ist ACP w. service rend Appeal No. Deepak So which was n vide Annex therefore, h evoked any given to the
2. limited pray
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ CHANDIGAR
CWP-28464
Date of dec
NESH
Versus HARYANA AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN
Mr. Paramvir Singh Doon, Adv for the petitioner.
Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Ha Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
HAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that .e.f. 01.01.2013, instead of 01.0 dered by him in the Sugar Mill, b .4446 of 2008, titled as ‘State o ood and others’, decided on not taken into account while reje xure P-11. A representation date has been submitted to the res y response. He, on instructions, em to decide the same in a time b Learned counsel for the respon yer made. JAB & HARYANA AT RH 4-2026 (O & M)
cision: 10.09.2026
....Petitioner
...Respondents N CHAUDHARY
vocate,
aryana.
the petitioner is entitled to the 03.2019, by counting the past based on the judgment in Civil of Haryana and another vs. 15.07.2008, Annexure P-14, ecting his claim on 25.09.2019, ed 04.09.2025, Annexure P-13, spondents, which has yet not prays that a direction may be bound manner. ndents have no objection to the PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.09.10 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-28464-2026
3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the aforesaid representation, within a period of 6 months, in accordance with law, taking note of the submissions made herein above as also the afore-judgment, granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner.
4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.
10.09.2026
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.09.10 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document