Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/48206/2025 of CHANDER BHAN Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48206-2025 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 CHANDER BHAN ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Ms. Roja Agnihotri, Advocate for Ms. Kamalpreet Kaur, advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
288-A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-48206-2025 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 CHANDER BHAN
... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Ms. Roja Agnihotri, Advocate for Ms. Kamalpreet Kaur, advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Kuljinder Singh, AAG, Punjab.
**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, is for quashing of the order dated 07.08.2025 (Annexure P-4) whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Kapurthala had issued non bailable warrants against the petitioner in case FIR No.67 dated 16.06.2022 under Sections 327, 347, 365, 387, 328, 323, 120-B and 34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Satnampura, Phagwara, District Kapurthala. On 01.09.2025, the following order was passed:- “The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of BNS, 2023 is for setting aside the order dated 07.08.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Kapurthala in case FIR No.67 dated 16.06.2022 under sections 327, 347, 365, 387, 328, 323, 120-B and 34 IPC registered at Police Station Satnampura, Phagwara, District Kapurthala and issued notice under Section 491 BNSS (446 Cr.P.C.) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that on account of noting down of a wrong date, the petitioner was unable to appear on 07.08.2025 because of which the impugned VISHAL SETHI 2026.09.11 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-48206-2025 -2- order came to be passed. He states that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings once again. Notice of motion for 26.11.2025. In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of one week from today and subject to a deposit of Rs.25,000/- as costs with Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, Chandigarh, Account No.65035682434, SBI High Court Branch, IFSC:- SBIN0050306, he shall be admitted to interim bail to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. A copy of the receipt depositing a sum of Rs.25,000/- with the aforesaid Association as well as a copy of the order granting interim bail to the petitioner be produced in the Court on the next date of hearing.” In deference to the aforementioned order, the petitioner has surrendered before the Trial Court and has been granted the concession of interim bail vide order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Kapurthala. A copy of the said order is taken on record and marked as Mark ‘A’. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court. It is expected that the petitioner shall not absent himself from the Trial without sufficient cause. Disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE September 10, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes VISHAL SETHI 2026.09.11 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document