Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/11048/2026 of SIMRAN KAUR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (152 ) SIMRAN KAUR AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Lokesh Vohra, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Ruchika Sabhe MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the

CRWP-11048-

IN THE H

SIMRAN KAU

STATE OF PU

CORAM: HO

Present:

Mr

Ms

MANISHA BA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Th Constitution of official respon petitioners at th representation d

2. At submitted that 28.08.2026 be (Annexure P-4) but the same h thereon. He furt -2026 (O&M)

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH

CR

D UR AND ANOTHER

Versus UNJAB AND OTHERS

ON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MAN

r. Lokesh Vohra, Advocate for th

s. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DA **** ATRA, J. (ORAL) he present petition has been file f India seeking issuance of a writ ndent Nos.1 to 4 to protect th he hands of respondent Nos.5 to dated 28.08.2026 (Annexure P-4 the very outset, learned coun the petitioners have recently efore the Senior Superintende ) raising their grievances as ment has not yet been considered and ther submitted that at this stage,

AND HARYANA AT RWP-11048-2026 (O&M) ate of decision : 10.09.2026 ... Petitioners

...Respondents NISHA BATRA he petitioners AG, Punjab ed under Article 226 of the t of mandamus directing the he life and liberty of the 8 and to take action on their ). nsel for the petitioners has y filed a representation on ent of Police, Hoshiarpur tioned in the present petition d no action has been taken the petitioners would be AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRWP-11048-

satisfied if app Superintendent filed by the peti

3. No

4. Ms notice on behal be done in due her during the c

5. In commenting an disposed of at t aforesaid repres within a period accordance wit petitioners, the in order to prote

10.09.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M)

propriate directions are issued of Police, Hoshiarpur to decide itioners and take necessary action otice of motion.

s. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D lf of the respondents-State and s course. Let a complete set of th course of the day. view of the limited prayer made nything on the merits of the c this stage with a direction to res sentation dated 28.08.2026 (Ann d of 15 days from today, by p th law. Needless to say, if a official respondents would prov ect their life and liberty. (M Whether speaking/reasoned:- Y Whether reportable:- Yes/No

to respondent No.2-Senior the aforesaid representation n thereon. DAG, Punjab, has advance submits that the needful will he paperbook be supplied to e by the petitioners, without case, the present petition is spondent No.2 to decide the nexure P-4) of the petitioners passing a speaking order in any threat is found to the vide them adequate security MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead