Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/29282/2026 of KASTURI DEVI Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 Kasturi Devi State of Haryana and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) in the nature of certiorari, mandamus or in any other nature directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner and to pay all consequential benefits as the petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN T
Kasturi D
State of H
CORAM
Present:-
NIDHI G
in the nat the respon all conseq 25 years interest. petitioner year 1998 continuou However, CWP-29282-2026 (O & M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGA
CWP No.29282
Date of decision Devi Versus Haryana and others M:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE N
Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocatae for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DA GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ pet ture of certiorari, mandamus or ndents to regularize the services quential benefits as the petition of service, including pension an It is, inter alia, submitted r that the petitioner joined the re 8 on daily-wage basis as a Part- usly working to the satisfaction o , her services have not bee
JAB AND HARYANA ARH 2 of 2026 (O & M) n :-10.09.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA AG, Haryana. tition is for issuance of a writ in any other nature directing s of the petitioner and to pay ner has completed more than nd other retiral benefits with by learned counsel for the espondent-Department in the -Time Sweeper and has been of the respondents since then. en regularized despite the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.09.10 18.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
representa 15.06.202 submissio of the pet A copy o taken on for the pe of the afo present w 09.07.202 petitioner liberty, as
Septembe Vijay Asija
Whether spe Whether Rep
CWP-29282-2026 (O & M) ation(s) submitted by him, inc 26 (Annexure P-9). Learned counsel for the Sta ons made on behalf of the petiti titioner already stands rejected v of the said order has been hand record. Copy thereof has been etitioner. Learned counsel for the peti oresaid development, he may b writ petition with liberty to 26, which, according to him, ha r. Ordered accordingly. The present writ petition is d s prayed for. Pending application(s), if any er 10, 2026
eaking/reasoned Yes / No portable Yes / No cluding representation dated ate, while controverting the ioner, submits that the claim vide order dated 09.07.2026. ded over in Court, which is supplied to learned counsel itioner submits that, in view e permitted to withdraw the challenge the order dated as not been conveyed to the dismissed as withdrawn with y, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.09.10 18.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document