Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/10429/2024 of SURENDER KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 Surender Kumar State of Haryana and others CORAM:- Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. ( dated 21.03 09.02.2024 ( contractual service for the post of Data Entry Operator on poor performance, whereas no notice was ever given to the petitione such poor
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CWP-1042
IN THE H
Surender K
State of Ha
CORAM:-
Present:-
NIDHI GU
dated 21.0 09.02.2024 contractual poor perfor such poor order dated another set of law and the year respondent experience and all the the respon remained 29-2024
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND
CWP
Date Kumar
Versus aryana and others
- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate for Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, H UPTA J. (ORAL) Prayer in this writ petition is 03.2024 (Annexure P-15) rejec 4 (Annexure P-14) for grant o l service for the post of Data En rmance, whereas no notice was e performance in duties; further d 27.02.2024 (Annexure P-16), t of contractual employee being without obtaining the sanction f 2024; further for quashing th t for levelling false allegatio certificate, as the same was is e experience certificates have be ndent authorities because the posted with the office of re
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH P-10429-2024 e of Decision: 10.09.2026
….. Petitioner
…..Respondents IDHI GUPTA r the petitioner. Haryana. for quashing impugned order cting the representation dated of sanction for extension of ntry Operator on the ground of ever given to the petitioner for r for quashing the impugned replacing the petitioner with voilative of settled principles for contractual employment for the impugned action of the on for obtaining the bogus sued by the respondent No.4, een issued to the petitioner by petitioner is working and espondent No.4 since 2011; RISHU KATARIA 2026.09.11 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgmdent.
CWP-1042
AND/OR (AnnexureP Agreement granted by granted in mentioned 28.12.2023 service, wi and cond discriminat 31.12.2024 settled prin to interfere he may be petitioner t law includi dated 01.01
10.09.2026 rishu
29-2024
further for quashing the impu P-12), to the extent that the san t/Contract in case of the petitio y the respondent authorities whi case of juniors to the petitioner therein; and for quashing 3 (Annexure P-13), whereby, th thout assigning any reasons and ditions of the Service Agr tory while granting the extensio 4 to the juniors to the petitioner ncipal of law “first-come last go After arguing for some time, w e in the matter, learned counsel permitted to withdraw the insta to take recourse to the appropria ing Arbitration as provided in th 1.2021 (Annexure P-9), if any. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn, wit Pending application(s), if any,
Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:
ugned order dated 21.12.2023 nction for renewal of Service oner has not been sought and ile seeking such sanction and as per the date of appointment the impugned Order dated he petitioner is relieved from being in violation of the terms eement/Contract and being on of contract of service up to , as well as being voilative of o”. when this Court is not inclined for the petitioner submits that ant petition with liberty to the ate remedy in accordance with he Service/Contract Agreement th the liberty aforesaid. , shall stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE : Yes / No Yes / No RISHU KATARIA 2026.09.11 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgmdent.