Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/27110/2025 of KARANDEEP SINGH Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1), CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.130 CWP-27110-2025 Date of decision: 11.09.2025 Karandeep Singh ....Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1), Chandigarh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present: Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.130
CWP-27110-2025
Date of decision: 11.09.2025
Karandeep Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1), Chandigarh and others
....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present:
Mr. Praagbir Singh Dhindsa, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Counsel
Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel
for the respondents.
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The challenge made through the instant petition is to the notice dated 24.03.2023 (Annexure P-1) issued to the petitioner by the respondents under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The primary ground of challenge raised by the petitioner is that the impugned notice has been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer which could have not been done because in terms of the notification dated 29.03.2022 (Annexure P-2) issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, the impugned notice could have been issued only by way of faceless assessment.
2. In support of his afore submission, learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the following two judgments of this Court:-
(i) CWP-15745-2024, titled Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, decided on 19.07.2024; and
(ii) CWP-21509-2023, titled Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India and others, decided on 29.07.2024. JYOTI SHARMA 2025.09.16 09:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
CWP-27110-2025 -2-
3. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the fact that the case of the petitioner is covered in his favour by the law laid down through the aforesaid two judgments rendered by two different co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu
and
Jasjit Singh
(supra)
.
4. In the light of the above, in terms of the law laid down in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu and Jasjit Singh (supra), the impugned notice dated 24.03.2023 (Annexure P-1) issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, is hereby quashed with liberty to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law.
5. The petition is disposed in the above terms. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE September 11, 2025 Jyoti 1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2025.09.16 09:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh