Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/45051/2026 of LAKHWINDER SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 10 September 2026

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 278 CRM-M-45051-2026 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 LAKHWINDER SINGH …PETITIONER V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 278 CRM-M-45051-2026 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 LAKHWINDER SINGH …PETITIONER V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Lekhi, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Jaskirat Singh, Advocate, for respondents. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) The prayer in this petition preferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS’), is for quashing of FIR No.27 dated 19.02.2023, registered at Police Station Gidderbaha, District Sri Muktsar Sahib under Section 326B of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (for short “BNS”) along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the petitioners and respondents No.2 to 6 (Annexure P-2).

2. Status report and the report dated 31.08.2026 received from the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gidderbaha through the office of the District & Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib, filed in the Registry, are taken on record.

3. Vide order dated 14.08.2026, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Area Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded with regard to the compromise (ibid). POONAM 2026.09.11 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Page 1 of 2

4. The Area Magistrate/trial Court was to submit a report in this regard in terms of the said order.

5. Pursuant to the order dated 14.08.2026, the parties appeared before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gidderbaha and as per the report dated 31.08.2026 submitted to this Court, both parties got their respective statements recorded.

6. A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. The powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the BNSS can be exercised in such like situations in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the directions issued by the Apex Court in “Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543” and a Five Judges Bench of this Court in “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052”.

7. In view of the aforesaid report of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Payal, accompanied by statements of both the parties, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.27 dated 19.02.2023, registered at Police Station Gidderbaha, District Sri Muktsar Sahib under Section 326B of BNS, 2023, with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.

(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)

JUDGE September 10, 2026 Poonam Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No POONAM 2026.09.11 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead