CRM-M/35570/2026 of RUCHAR BANSAL @ VICKY Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR on 10 September 2026

1. Sections 316 Amloh, Distr therefrom, on

2. learned trial regard to com

3. learned Judic

THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIGA BANSAL @ VICKY VERSUS

PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Ms. Komalpreet Kaur, Advocate Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DA

Mr. Prikshit Thakur, Advocate For respondent No.2.

*** gh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of FIR 6, 318(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya rict Fatehgarh Sahib and all co n the basis of compromise dated On 06.07.2026, this Court direc Court/Illaqa Magistrate for rec mpromise dated 22.04.2026. In compliance of the aforesaid cial Magistrate First Class, Aml

NJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRM-M-35570-2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026

…PETITIONER

...RESPONDENTS LINI SINGH NAGPAL e for AG, Punjab. R No.81 dated 11.04.2026 under Sanhita, 2023, Police Station onsequential proceedings arising 22.04.2026. cted the parties to appear before cording of their statements with d order, parties appeared before loh on 10.07.2026. Statement of r n g e h e f JYOTI

Investigating Learned Jud recording sa compromise has been sub p

g Officer SI Taranjit Singh w icial Magistrate First Class, Am atisfaction that all the partie without any influence or coerc mitted: “1. It is humbly submitted th person namely Ruchar Bansal @

2. It is humbly submitted that Vicky never declared proclaim and no PO proceedings is pendi

3. It is humbly submitted t complainant and accused per Vicky as well as after his exami view that compromise have complainant and the accused genuine, voluntarily and with influence.

4. It is humbly submitted that t against the said accused.

5. It is humbly submitted that in Gurnam Singh has appeared and

6. It is humbly submitted that th investigation and the challan ha

was recorded on 13.07.2026. mloh, has submitted her report es have entered into a valid cion. Point-wise report as under hat there is only one accused @ Vicky in the present FIR. the accused Ruchar Bansal @ ed offender in the present FIR ing or initiated against him. that as per the statement of rson namely Ruchar Bansal@ ination in the Court, I am of the been effected between the d Ruchar Bansal @ Vicky is hout any coercion or undue there is no other FIR registered njured/aggrieved person namely d his statement was recorded. he case is at the stage of police as not been presented till date.” . t d r d @ R f @ e e s e d y e JYOTI

4. factum of c continuation

5. Judgment of and another “Gian Singh petition is all

6. Bharatiya Ny Sahib and al the petitioner

7. 10.09.2026 Jyoti-V

Learned State counsel has not r compromise. Since the matter of the criminal proceedings wou Following principles of law l this Court in “Kulwinder Singh ” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 h Versus State of Punjab and o lowed. FIR No.81 dated 11.04.2026 u yaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Sta l consequential proceedings aris r, on the basis of compromise da Pending applications, if any, stan

Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable :

raised any dispute regarding the has been amicably resolved, uld be an exercise in futility. laid down by the Full Bench h and others Vs. State of Punjab 2 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in others”(2012) 10 SCC 303, the under Sections 316, 318(4) of ation Amloh, District Fatehgarh sing therefrom, are quashed qua ated 22.04.2026. nd disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE

Yes/No

Yes/No e , h b n e f h a

) JYOTI