Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/15883/2025 of KAMLESH LAKHANI Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4) FARIDABAD AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 CWP-15883-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-28.05.2025 Kamlesh Lakhani ....Petitioner Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (4), Faridabad & ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr.
CWP-15883-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP-15883-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-28.05.2025
Kamlesh Lakhani
....Petitioner
Vs.
Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (4), Faridabad & ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present:
Mr. Kartik Bansal, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Varun Issar, Sr. Standing counsel with Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Jr. Standing counsel for the respondents ***
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Challenge in the present petition is to notice dated 24.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act 1961’) and all consequential actions, for AY 2017-2018.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, passed in CWP No. 15745-2024 and connected matter, decided on 19.07.2024 and Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India and others (CWP No. 21509- 2023 and other connected matters), decided on 29.07.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner has preferred an appeal and the same is pending before the Appellate Authority.
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same.
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
2025.06.06 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-15883-2025
whole records of the case.
5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 24.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Act, 1961 and all consequential actions, for AY 2017-2018, in view of the circular/notification dated 29.03.2022 of the CBDT, wherein, it has been specifically enumerated that the NFAC has exclusive power to issue the notice under Section 148 of the Act, 1961.
6. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Jatinder Singh Bhangu’s case (supra) and Jasjit Singh’s case (supra), allowed the writ petitions on the same issue, as raised in the present writ petition, by granting liberty to the revenue to follow the procedure as laid down under the Act, 1961 and proceed accordingly, if so advised.
7. Since in the present case, the appeal is pending before the Appellate Authority, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal of the petitioner, in terms of the judgments mentioned above.
8. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (LISA GILL)
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE 28.05.2025
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Gaurav Arora 2025.06.06 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document