Punjab and Haryana High Court

CR/6783/2026 of SUKHMANDER SINGH Vs DARSHAN SINGH AND ORS. on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 134 CR-6783-2026(O&M) Date of Decision : September 10, 2026 SUKHMANDER SINGH .....Petitioner VERSUS DARSHAN SINGH MALHI AND ORS. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present : Mr. Aakash Singla, Advocate for the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CR-6783-2026(O&M)

Date of Decision : September 10, 2026

SUKHMANDER SINGH

.....Petitioner

VERSUS

DARSHAN SINGH MALHI AND ORS.

.....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA

Present :

Mr. Aakash Singla, Advocate

for the petitioner.

****

DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present revision petition has been filed seeking directions to the lower Appellate Court to decide the appeal filed by the respondents- plaintiffs/appellants, in a time bound manner.

2. A perusal of the facts of the present case would show that the respondents-plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the resolution dated 03.10.2016 of defendant No.7-M/s Skylark Ceramic Limited, in favour of defendant No.1-Jasbir Singh was illegal and void. It transpires that the abovesaid plaint was rejected vide order dated 21.11.2024 (Annexure P-5). Aggrieved against the abovesaid order dated 21.11.2024 (Annexure P-

5) passed by the trial Court, the respondents-plaintiffs/appellants have filed an appeal before the lower Appellate Court.

AJAY KUMAR 2026.09.11 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/ judgement Chandigarh

CR-6783-2026(O&M)

3. The limited prayer in the present revision petition is for issuance of a direction to the lower Appellate Court to decide the appeal filed by the plaintiffs/appellants, in a time bound manner.

4. Taking into consideration the nature of the prayer made in the present revision petition, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents.

5. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present revision is disposed of with a request to the lower Appellate Court to make every endeavour to decide the appeal filed by the respondents-plaintiffs/appellants expeditiously, in accordance with law.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.

(DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) September 10, 2026

JUDGE ajaysharma Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. :

Yes/No AJAY KUMAR 2026.09.11 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/ judgement Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead