Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/10290/2020 of BALJEET YADAV Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR on 10 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 222 CWP-10290-2020 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 Baljeet Yadav ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Jatinder Kumar Kharwal, Advocate for the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
Baljeet Yadav
....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present :
Mr. Jatinder Kumar Kharwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. N.S. Panwar, DAG Haryana-State.
Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for respondent No.2.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing revised final result dated 29.02.2020 (Annexure P-7) and answer key (Annexure P-3) to the extent whereby petitioner has been declared to be not qualified for Haryana Teacher Eligibility Test Nov-2019 despite the fact that petitioner has fully qualified the said examination. Further praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to award one mark to petitioner for the answer to which has been wrongly held to be incorrect by respondent No.2. PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.09.10 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the present writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 10.09.2026 Puneet Chawla
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No
Whether Reportable. :
Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.09.10 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document