Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/50418/2026 of PRABAL JINDAL Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50418-2026 Date of Decision:10.09.2026 Prabal Jindal …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and Ors. …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Aman Pal, Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. Neha Rani, Advocate Mr.
132
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-50418-2026
Date of Decision:10.09.2026
Prabal Jindal
…Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab and Ors.
…Respondents
Coram :
Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat
Present:
Mr. Aman Pal, Sr. Advocate assisted by
Ms. Neha Rani, Advocate
Mr. Rishabh Chaudhary, Advocate
Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. M.S Bajwa, DAG, Punjab.
***
N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to issue appropriate directions to respondents No.2 to 4 to constitute an S.I.T headed by a Senior Officer for the purpose of conducting an impartial and independent enquiry into the unlawful acts, being committed by respondents No.5 to 8.
2. On advance notice, Mr. M.S Bajwa, DAG, Punjab has appeared on behalf of official respondents and submits that a complaint was received by the S.S.P, Patiala and the S.P (Headquarter) had initially conducted enquiry in the present case. However, after holding the enquiry, the complaint has been ordered to be filed as the dispute was of civil nature.
3. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition.
4. Dismissed as not pressed.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 10.09.2026
JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.09.10 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh