Punjab and Haryana High Court

CWP/29319/2026 of SUMAN CHAUDHARY Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 Suman Chaudhary State of Haryana and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) 1. in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner and grant all consequential service benefits, along with interest @ 12% per annum. 2.

IN T

Suman C

State of H

CORAM

Present:-

NIDHI G

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. in the nat services o along with

2. petitioner applicatio Officer-cu petitioner selected, P-2), purs the petitio CWP-29319-2026 (O & M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGA

CWP No.29319

Date of decision Chaudhary Versus Haryana and another M:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE N

Mr. Jamshed Ahmed, Advoc for the petitioner.

Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DA GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ pet ture of Mandamus directing the r of the petitioner and grant all co h interest @ 12% per annum. It is, inter alia, submitted r that pursuant to the adve ons were invited for three san um-Child Marriage Prohibitio r participated in the selection was issued appointment letter d suant to which she joined the pos oner has been continuously work

JAB AND HARYANA ARH 9 of 2026 (O & M) n :-10.09.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA cate AG, Haryana. tition is for issuance of a writ respondents to regularize the onsequential service benefits, by learned counsel for the ertisement (Annexure P-1), nctioned posts of Protection on Officer (Female). The n process and, upon being dated 04.01.2012 (Annexure st on 06.01.2012. Since then, king to the satisfaction of the VIJAY ASIJA

responden passed by and other entitled to ten years

this stage is dispose for regula judgment that the 01.06.202 considera petition b

3.

4. on behalf present w to submit

5. permitted directed t case (supr

6. the praye CWP-29319-2026 (O & M) nt-Department. It is contended t y the Hon’ble Supreme Court in rs”, reported as 2024 SCC OnLi o consideration for regularization of continuous service. Learned counsel for the petit , the petitioner would be satisfie ed of with a direction to the respo arization in accordance with law in Jaggo’s case (supra). Lear petitioner had already submit 26 (Annexure P-5), which ation before the respondent-Au e treated as a representation. Notice of motion. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DA f of respondents and submits t writ petition as a representation, a fresh representation with rega Learned counsel for the peti d to submit a fresh representat to consider the same in the light ra). Learned State counsel submi r made by learned counsel for t that, in view of the judgment n “Jaggo vs. Union of India ine SC 3826, the petitioner is n having rendered more than tioner further submits that, at ed if the present writ petition ondents to consider her claim w, while keeping in view the rned counsel further submits tted a representation dated is stated to be pending uthority, or the present writ AG, Haryana accepts notice that, instead of treating the the petitioner may be asked ard to her grievance. tioner prays that she may be tion and the respondents be t of the judgment in Jaggo’s its that he has no objection to the petitioner being accepted VIJAY ASIJA

at this sta petitioner rendered considera

7. expressin petition i submits a a period o decided b order, in thereafter Competen the Hon’ relevant r

8. Septembe Vijay Asija

Whether spe Whether Rep

CWP-29319-2026 (O & M) age. It is, however, submitted th r would require verification to continuous and satisfactory ser ation for regularization. After hearing learned counse ng any opinion on the merits o s disposed of with a direction a fresh representation before the of two weeks from today, the s by the said Authority by passin accordance with law, within

r. While considering the cla nt Authority shall also keep in v ble Supreme Court in Jaggo’ rules/instructions governing the c Pending application(s), if any er 10, 2026

eaking/reasoned Yes / No portable Yes / No hat the service tenure of the o ascertain whether she has rvice so as to be eligible for el for the parties and without of the case, the present writ n that, in case the petitioner Competent Authority within ame shall be considered and ng a speaking and reasoned n a period of four months aim of the petitioner, the view the judgment passed by ’s case (supra), as also the claim of the petitioner. y, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA )

JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead