Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/17036/2024 of ROHIT MEHTA Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5 1 LUDHIANA AND ORS on 10 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ROHIT MEHTAROHIT MEHTAROHIT MEHTAROHIT MEHTA INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5 1 LINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5 1 LINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5 1
IN T
IN T
IN T
IN T
ROHIT MEHT
ROHIT MEHT
ROHIT MEHT
ROHIT MEHT
INCOME TAX
INCOME TAX
INCOME TAX
INCOME TAX
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM: HO
HO
HO
HO
Present :
M
M
M
for
**
DEEPAK SIB
DEEPAK SIB
DEEPAK SIB
DEEPAK SIB
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Le also be entitled this Court date Union of India
2. In terms of Jyoti notice dated 3 Income Tax Ac
10.09 10.09 10.09 10.09.2026 .2026 .2026 .2026 Vandana yadav
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH
CW CW CW CW Da Da Da Da
TA TA TA TA
VERSUS VERSUS VERSUS VERSUS X OFFICER WARD 5 1 L X OFFICER WARD 5 1 L X OFFICER WARD 5 1 L X OFFICER WARD 5 1 LUDH UDH UDH UDH
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEP DEEP DEEP DEEP ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI Mr. Sholab Arora, Advocate, for th Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing C
r. Vidul Kapoor, Jr. Standing Co r the respondents. *** BAL AL BAL AL, J. , J. , J. , J.(O (O (O (Oral ral ral ral) earned counsel for the parties a d to the same relief as has been ed 10.09.2026 passed in CWP- a and others. n the light of the above consen i Sareen’s case (supra), resulting 31.03.2024 issued to the petitio ct, 1961 alongwith consequential
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Ye Whether Reportable. : Ye AB AND HARYANA AB AND HARYANA AB AND HARYANA AB AND HARYANA H WP WP WP WP-17036 17036 17036 17036-2024
ate of Decision : ate of Decision : ate of Decision : ate of Decision : 10.09.
10.09.
10.09. 10.09.2026
...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER HIANA AND ORS HIANA AND ORS HIANA AND ORS HIANA AND ORS
...RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENTS PAK SIBAL PAK SIBAL PAK SIBAL PAK SIBAL ISH BINDLISH ISH BINDLISH ISH BINDLISH ISH BINDLISH he petitioner. Counsel with unsel, agree that the petitioner would n granted through a judgment of -15791-2024 – Jyoti Sareen vs. nsus, the petition is allowed in g in quashing of the impugned oner under Section 148 of the l proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLISH) (SUNISH BINDLISH) (SUNISH BINDLISH) (SUNISH BINDLISH)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE es/No es/No
d f . n d e VANDANA YADAV 2026.09.13 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document