Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/2630/2018 of M/S DEVINDERA STEEL INDUSTRIES Vs PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, UT, CHANDIGARH & ANR. on 10 September 2026
of 2018 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (233) CWP No. 2630 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 M/s Devindera Steel Industries ......Petitioner Versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour ....Respondents Court, U.T., Chandigarh and
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
M/s Devindera Steel Industries
......Petitioner
Versus
Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
....Respondents
Court, U.T., Chandigarh and another
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH
Present:
Mr. D.K.Tuteja, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Ms. Neha Sonawane, Advocate and
Ms. Pranhita Singh, Advocate
for respondent No. 2.
****
KIRTI SINGH
, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the award dated 30.8.2016 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No. 1, whereby respondent No.2-workman has been ordered to be reinstated in service with 25% of back wages.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court on 24.8.2026, and in view of the settlement, a lump-sum compensation of Rs. 85,000/- has been released to respondent No. 2.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also admitted the factum of settlement arrived at between the parties.
4. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the GURPREET SINGH 2026.09.11 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh present petition does not survive for consideration.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of in the terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Award dated 30.8.2016 shall not come in the way of the consensus arrived at between the parties, which shall be bound by the terms thereof.
6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(KIRTI SINGH)
JUDGE September 10th, 2026
Gurpreet Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2026.09.11 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh