Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/22101/2026 of DEEPAK ALIAS DEEPAK RAJ AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
1111 222277776666 IIIINNNN TTTTHHHHEEEE HHHHIIIIGGGGHHHH CCCCOOOOUUUURRRRTTTT OOOOFFFF PPPPUUUUNNNNJJJJAAAABBBB AAAANNNNDDDD HHHHAAAARRRRYYYYAAAANNNNAAAA AAAATTTT CCCCHHHHAAAANNNNDDDDIIIIGGGGAAAARRRRHHHH CCCCRRRRMMMM----MMMM----22222222111100001111----2222000022226666
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-22101-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
DEEPAK ALIAS DEEPAK RAJ AND OTHERS ... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:-
Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Vishal Kashyap, Sr. DAG Haryana.
Mr. K.S.Rawat, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS (Section 482 Cr.P.C.) for quashing of FIR No. 0064 dated 28.07.2018 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 506 of IPC, (sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS) registered at Police Station Naggal, District Ambala along with all consequential proceedings including challan filed for offences under Section 148, 149, 323, 506, 325 & 452 of IPC (sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 351(2) (3), 117(2), 333 of BNS) and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).
2. This Court vide order dated 22.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambala and got their statements JANKI BHATT 2026.09.11 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambala has submitted copy of report dated 14.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 0064 dated 28.07.2018 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 506 of IPC, (sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS) registered at Police Station Naggal, District Ambala along with all consequential proceedings including challan filed for offences under Section 148, 149, 323, 506, 325 & 452 of IPC (sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 351(2) (3), 117(2), 333 of BNS) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioners on the basis of compromise.
(H.S.GREWAL) 10.09.2026
JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.09.11 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document