Punjab and Haryana High Court
FAO/6093/2019 of RAMESH KUMAR Vs BEER SINGH AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
510 FAO-6093 RAMESH KUMAR Present: was issued to him which was duly served. date, Mr. Advocate and on to 26.08.2026 and then adjourned to 02.09.2026. On that date, nobody appeared for the appellant and the matter was adjourned for today. has been informed through email but in spite of that
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
DAILY LOK
FAO-6093 RAMESH
Present:
was issued date, Mr. Advocate to 26.08.2 appeared f
has been i the appell counsel fo enhanceme in this rega
not interes
the record moving an
as also to t
10.09.202 sd K ADALAT
3-2019 H KUMAR Vs BEER SINGH A None for the appellant.
Mr.Punit Jain, Advocate for the Insurance company.
As nobody appeared for the d to him which was duly serve Aman Arora, Advocate appe and on the joint request of both 2026 and then adjourned to 02. for the appellant and the matter w It is reported by the office th informed through email but in s lant. When staff of this forum r the appellant, he did not pick u ent has not been submitted in s ard. From these circumstances, it sted to pursue the appeal any furt In the circumstances, the appe with liberty to the appellant to n appropriate application. A copy of this order be sent to the last known address of the app
BENCH NO.3 AND OTHERS appellant on 13.07.2026, notice ed. However, on the adjourned eared for Mr. Mukesh Yadav, sides, the matter was adjourned .09.2026. On that date, nobody was adjourned for today. hat the counsel for the appellant spite of that nobody appears for m attempted to contact learned up the call. Even the proposal for pite of specific direction issued comes out that the appellant is ther. eal is ordered to be consigned to get it revived, if so advised, by o learned counsel for the parties pellant.
(M.S. CHAUHAN) PRESIDENT (B.S. WALIA)
MEMBER
e d , d y t r d r d s o y s
T
) SUDHIR KUMAR 2026.09.11 12:09 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment