Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/45021/2026 of KRISHNA ALIAS KRISHNA DEVI AND OTHERS Vs HIRA LAL SHARMA on 3 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (157) CRM-M-45021-2026 Krishna @ Krishna Devi and others ……Petitioner(s) Versus Hira Lal Sharma ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 03.09.2026 Date of uploading: 03.09.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Ms. Preeti
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-45021-2026
Krishna @ Krishna Devi and others
……Petitioner(s)
Versus
Hira Lal Sharma
……Respondent(s)
Decided on : 03.09.2026
Date of uploading: 03.09.2026
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present:
Ms. Preeti Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner (s)
(Through V.C.).
Mr. Karan Duggal, Advocate for the respondent.
*****
Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral):
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus:
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present Petition, may kindly be allowed and impugned complaint No. COMI/40/2023 dated 16.05.2023, titled as "Hira Lal Sharma vs Krishana etc." (Annexure P-4) filed by the respondent in the court of Ld. JMIC, Sirsa against the petitioners, which is misconceived, false, frivolous, vexatious, ill-motivated and counter-blast litigation filed with the sole object to harass and humiliate the petitioners and is not sustainable in the eyes law, may kindly be quashed.
AND
It is further prayed that impugned summoning order dated 10.01.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed in above-titled complaint no. COMI/40/2023 dated 16.05.2023 (Annexure P-4) whereby the petitioners were summoned for commission of offence punishable under section 323 and 506 read with section 34 of IPC, and all subsequent and consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua the present Petitioners, may kindly be quashed/ set aside.”
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.03 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.
CRM-M-45021-2026
2. During the course of hearing, it has been brought to the fore that a revision petition challenging the impugned summoning order, is pending for adjudication before the concerned Sessions Court.
3. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition in hand, so as to enable the petitioners to pursue the said revision petition.
4. Ordered accordingly.
(SUMEET GOEL) September 03, 2026
JUDGE Naveen
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.03 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.