Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/44093/2026 of GAURAV @ GAURA Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 3 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (211) CRM-M-44093-2026 (O&M) Decided on: 03.09.2026 Uploaded on: 03.09.2026 Gaurav @ Gaura ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Dinesh Maurya,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(211)
CRM-M-44093-2026 (O&M)
Decided on: 03.09.2026
Uploaded on: 03.09.2026
Gaurav @ Gaura
……Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana
……Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present:
Mr. Dinesh Maurya, Advocate, for the petitioner (s).
Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
*****
Sumeet Goel (Oral):
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.145 dated 11.04.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 126, 190, 191(3) of BNS 2023 & Section 25 of the Arms Act 1959, (Sections 111(2), 238(b) of the BNS & Section 25(1-B)(a) of the Arms Act added later on), at Police Station Bhiwani City, District Bhiwani, the petitioner has preferred this second petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail.
2. On 10.08.2026, the following order was passed:
“Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.145 dated 11.04.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 126, 190, 191(3) of BNS 2023 & Section 25 of the Arms Act 1959, (Sections 111(2), 238(b) of the BNS & Section 25(1- B)(a) of the Arms Act added later on), at Police Station Bhiwani City, District Bhiwani, the petitioner has preferred this second petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.03 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.
CRM-M-44093-2026 (O&M)
P a g e | 2
Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that no culpability was earlier found against the petitioner by the police, the petitioner has been subsequently summoned by the concerned trial Court exercising powers under Section 358 of BNSS 2023 (erstwhile Section 319 Cr.P.C.) & the petitioner is willing to cause appearance before the concerned trial Court and face trial in accordance with law.
Notice of motion.
On the strength of advance copy; Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Senior DAG, Haryana causes appearance on behalf of the respondent-State. She seeks and is permitted time to file reply, with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner is permitted to cause appearance before the concerned trial Court on 14.08.2026 at 11:00 AM and on his doing so, he be admitted to interim bail to the satisfaction of the said Court.
List on 03.09.2026.”
3. Learned rival counsel are ad idem that the petitioner has caused appearance before the concerned trial Court on 14.08.2026, in terms of interim order dated 10.08.2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner shall continue to join the proceedings before the concerned trial Court, in accordance with law.
4. In view of the above, the petition in hand is allowed & the interim order dated 10.08.2026 is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.
(SUMEET GOEL) 03.09.2026
JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.03 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.