Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/40703/2026 of SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER on 3 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40703-2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None for the petitioners. Ms. Navreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.
280
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-40703-2026
Date of Decision: 03.09.2026
SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER
...Petitioners
Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
None for the petitioners.
Ms. Navreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J.
(Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. On 24.07.2026, when the matter was listed for hearing, the same was ajdourned for today, i.e., 03.09.2026 as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners even today despite second call. It can be safely presumed that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant petition on the docket, indefinitely.
2. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 03.09.2026 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2026.09.03 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh