Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/72825/2025 of PREETI Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on 3 September 2026
M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (129) CRM-M-72825-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 03.09.2026 Preeti ... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Haryana and ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. D.P.S. Bajwa, Advocate, for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(129) CRM-M-72825-2025 (O & M)
Date of decision: 03.09.2026 Preeti
... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Haryana and ors. ...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. D.P.S. Bajwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI,
J. (Oral)
The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 is for quashing of the impugned order dated 11.09.2025 (Annexure P-
4) passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Yamuna Nagar vide which the complaint bearing No.COM/159/2025 (Annexure P-3) moved by the petitioner with prayer to send the same under Section 175(3) BNS to the SHO of Police Station City Yamuna Nagar for registration of an FIR under Sections 61(2), 316(2), 318(4), 338, 340(2) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023, has been dismissed and no opportunity has been granted to treat the case as a complaint case.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner would be satisfied in case directions are issued to the Trial Court permitting the petitioner/complainant to file a private complaint.
3. Notice of motion. SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.03 18:17 I agree to specified portions of this document
::2::
4. Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Addl. A.G., Haryana, present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that she has no objection to the prayer made by the petitioner.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
6. In view of the prayer made, it is clarified that the impugned order dated 11.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) shall not preclude the petitioner/complaint to file a private complaint in accordance with law.
7. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in this case.
8. This petition stands disposed of. September 03, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.03 18:17 I agree to specified portions of this document