Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/39571/2026 of KARAN Vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH on 3 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39571-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 03.09.2026 KARAN ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Manjot Gujral, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Manish Bansal,
223
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-39571-2026(O&M)
Date of decision: 03.09.2026
KARAN
...Petitioner
Vs.
STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present:
Mr. Manjot Gujral, Advocate
for the petitioner (through V.C.).
Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P. U.T. Chandigarh, Mr. Dixit Bhardwaj, Advocate and for the respondent.
***
VIKRAM AGGARWAL,
J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Custody certificate dated 02.09.2026 filed today in Court is taken on record.
2. Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, at this stage.
3. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) 03.09.2026 JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2026.09.03 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document