Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/10528/2026 of RANJEET SINGH ATWAL @ RANJIT SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 3 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

-2- 2. Report of the warrant officer has been received. Detenue- Satnam Singh was not found to be in the custody of Police Station, Phillaur whereas statements have been made by the police officials that Satnam Singh was called to the police station as a notice has been received from Police

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

POONAM 2026.09.03 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-10528-2026 (O&M) -2-

2. Report of the warrant officer has been received. Detenue- Satnam Singh was not found to be in the custody of Police Station, Phillaur whereas statements have been made by the police officials that Satnam Singh was called to the police station as a notice has been received from Police Station Kathgarh, District SBS Nagar in case FIR No.133 of 19.08.2026 registered under Section 61 of Punjab Excise Act and Satnam Singh was implicated in that case vide GD No.29 of 20.08.2026 and further, SHO Kathgarh has sent a requisition to SBS Nagar for getting noted Satnam Singh that he is required to appear in Police Station Kathgarh on 04.09.2026 in connection with investigation with FIR No.133 dated 19.08.2026. Satnam Singh met the warrant officer outside the police station and has made statement that he was called in the police station and was kept in the rooms from morning till evening but he was not maltreated and his signatures were obtained on some blank papers and has been let off at 07.45 pm. So, Satnam Singh met the warrant officer outside the police Station and has made a statement whereas police officials of Police Sation Phillaur has provided documents to the warrant officer that Satnam Singh was required in investigation of the case registered at Police Station, Kathgarh.

3. As such, for the time being, no further action is required. Petition is disposed of. Petitioner can take appropriate legal remedy available.

4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also be disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 03.09.2026 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

POONAM 2026.09.03 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead