Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/10919/2026 of SUNIL KUSHVAHA Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER on 3 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10919-2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 DABLU KUMAR YADAV ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Abhishek Goel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vipul Sherwal,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-10919-2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 DABLU KUMAR YADAV
... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Abhishek Goel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Bhavya Vats, Advocate for respondent No.2.
**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for quashing of an FIR No.415 dated 27.12.2025 under Sections 115, 126, 351(3) of BNS (Sections 323, 339 and 506 IPC) registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, Sonepat, Haryana and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 22.01.2026 (Annexure P-2), entered into between the parties. Vide order dated 25.02.2026 this Court had directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in terms of certain parameters given in the aforesaid order dated 25.02.2026 with regard to the compromise (Annexure P-2). In terms of the order dated 25.02.2026 passed by this Court parties have appeared before the court of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sonepat and as per the report dated 02.07.2026, submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. VISHAL SETHI 2026.09.03 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-10919-2026
A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543. In view of the aforesaid report of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sonepat accompanied by the joint statement of both the parties, the present FIR No.415 dated 27.12.2025 under Sections 115, 126, 351(3) of BNS (Sections 323, 339 and 506 IPC) registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, Sonepat, Haryana and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners herein. Petition stands disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE September 03, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.09.03 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document