Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/54877/2025 of AMRITPAL SINGH AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 3 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

(O&M) -2- 3. Report has since been received from learned District and Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib, in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

POONAM 2026.09.07 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-54877-2025 (O&M) -2-

3. Report has since been received from learned District and Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib, in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondents have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed.

4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report.

5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and the private respondents are the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.

6. In view of the report of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed, qua the petitioners.

7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 03.09.2026 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

POONAM 2026.09.07 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead