Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/9725/2026 of PAWAN KUMAR @ PAWAN GILL Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 3 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9725-2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 PAWAN KUMAR @ PAWAN GILL ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Harmanpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Kuljinder
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-9725-2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 PAWAN KUMAR @ PAWAN GILL
... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Harmanpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Kuljinder Singh Dhindsa, AAG, Punjab.
**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is for quashing of the order dated 10.11.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Amritsar in case FIR No.305 dated 05.12.2020 registered under Sections 307, 341, 506, 34 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act at Police Station Majitha, District Amritsar Rural whereby the bail granted to the petitioner has been cancelled and non-bailable warrants have been issued against the petitioner on 11.03.2026. On 07.03.2026, the following order was passed:- “The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is for quashing of the order dated 10.11.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Amritsar in case FIR No.305 dated 05.12.2020 registered under Sections 307, 341, 506, 34 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act at Police Station Majitha, District Amritsar Rural whereby the bail granted to the petitioner has been cancelled and non- bailable warrants have been issued against the petitioner on 11.03.2026. VISHAL SETHI 2026.09.03 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-9725-2026
The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that on account of noting down of a wrong date the petitioner was unable to appear before the Trial Court because of which the impugned order came to be passed. He states that he is ready and willing to join proceedings once again. Notice of motion for 06.05.2026. In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of one week from today subject to a deposit of Rs.25,000/- as costs with the Punjab and Haryana High Court Employees Welfare Association, Account no. 37167209613 IFSC Code:-SBIN0050306 State Bank of India, High Court Branch, Chandigarh and on his doing he shall be admitted to interim bail to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.” In deference to the aforementioned order, the petitioner has surrendered before the Trial Court and has since been granted the concession of interim bail vide order dated 12.03.2026 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Amrtisar. A copy of the said order is taken on record and marked as Mark ‘A’. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court. It is expected that the petitioner shall not absent himself from the Trial without sufficient cause. Disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE September 03, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.09.03 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document