Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/10679/2026 of LOVELY AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 3 September 2026
M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (113) CRWP-10679-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 03.09.2026 Lovely and anr. ...Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Amit Thakur, Advocate, for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(113) CRWP-10679-2026 (O & M)
Date of decision: 03.09.2026 Lovely and anr.
...Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and ors.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Amit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI,
J. (Oral)
The prayer in the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the official respondents No.2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the private respondents No.5 to 11 and their associates and further directing the private respondents not to interfere in the peaceful live-in relationship of the petitioners.
2. Notice of motion.
3. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab, present in the Court, accepts notice and at the very outset, submits that, though, the petitioners are untraceable, the statements of the private respondents who are the relatives of petitioner No.1-Lovely, have been recorded and they have stated that they shall not interfere in the life of the petitioners. SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.03 18:36 I agree to specified portions of this document
::2::
4. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed.
5. The present petition stands disposed of. September 03, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.03 18:36 I agree to specified portions of this document