Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/10595/2026 of MAMTA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 2 September 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10595-2026 Date of Decision: 02.09.2026 MAMTA AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Manjit Singh Gahlawat, Advocate for the petitioners. ****
119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-10595-2026
Date of Decision: 02.09.2026
MAMTA AND ANOTHER
...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Manjit Singh Gahlawat, Advocate for the petitioners.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents no.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents No.4 to 7 and other persons not to harass or interfere in the life of the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 has been in a live in relationship with petitioner No.2. The private respondents have been extending threats of dire consequences to the petitioners as they are averse to their live in relationship. While drawing the attention of this Court to representation dated 22.08.2026 (Annexure P- 5), learned counsel has submitted that the matter was reported to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Jind, Haryana seeking police help but in vain. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of RENU RAWAT 2026.09.02 16.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Police, Jind, Haryana to look into the aforesaid representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only.
4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.
5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting upon the status of live in relationship of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Jind, Haryana to look into the representation dated 22.08.2026 (Annexure P-5) qua the alleged threat perception and take necessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopard- ized at the hands of the private respondent. However, this direction will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that there is no adjudication on merits and this is not a blanket order of protection from arrest in any FIR. It is further made clear that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogation of the petitioners is required in any cognizable case.
(H.S.GREWAL) 02.09.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.09.02 16.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh