Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/31244/2026 of JATIN KUMAR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 2 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 222 CRM-M-31244-2026 JATIN KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT DATE OF DECISION: 02.09.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 02.09.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 222
CRM-M-31244-2026
JATIN KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB
.....RESPONDENT DATE OF DECISION: 02.09.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 02.09.2026
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jaypreet Singh, DAG, Punjab. ….. SUMEET GOEL
, J (ORAL)
Present 3rd petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.531 dated 30.12.2024 under Section 22 of NDPS Act and Sections 29/61/85 of NDPS Act added later on, registered at Police Station City Barnala, District Barnala. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand on the ground that certain inadvertent errors have crept into the petition. He submits that he may be permitted to file afresh on the same cause of action. Ordered accordingly.
(SUMEET GOEL) 02.09.2026
JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2026.09.02 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document