Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/38541/2026 of VANSH SHARMA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Vansh Sharma State of Punjab Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of Uploading:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-3854

IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG Vansh Sharm State of Punj

Date of decis Date of decis Date of decis Date of decis Date of Uplo Date of Uplo Date of Uplo Date of Uplo

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

Present Present Present Present:

SUMEET G SUMEET G SUMEET G SUMEET G

2023 for gra registered f 25(7)(i), 25( Amritsar.

2. seeks to with

3.

4. September 0 September 0 September 0 September 0 mahavir Whether spea Whether repo

41-2026

GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-38541 38541 38541 38541-2

ma versus jab

sion: sion: sion: sion: September September September September 02

02, 2026

oading: oading: oading: oading: September 02 September 02 September 02 September 02, 2026

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUME HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUME HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUME HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUME Mr. Ramnish Puri, Advocate for t Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG P ***** ***** ***** *****

GOEL GOEL GOEL GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed u ant of regular bail, in case bearin for commission of offences pun

(8) of the Arms Act, 1959, at Pol Learned counsel for the petition hdraw the petition in hand, at this s Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, sh

02, 2026

aking/reasoned: Yes/No ortable:

Yes/No

HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH

....Petitioner

....Respondent EET GOEL EET GOEL EET GOEL EET GOEL the petitioner. Punjab. under Section 483 of the BNSS, ng FIR No.42 dated 11.03.2026, nishable under Sections 25(6), lice Station Cantonment, District ner, after arguing for sometime, tage. all also stand disposed of.

(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)

JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.09.02 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead