Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/5567/2026 of PRINCE Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 2 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 CRWP-5567-2026 Date of decision: 02.09.2026 PRINCE ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present:- Mr. C.S. Jattana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226
CRWP-5567-2026 Date of decision: 02.09.2026 PRINCE ….Petitioner
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present:- Mr. C.S. Jattana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG, Punjab. ***** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.(ORAL) The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to official respondents No.2 to 4 to protect life, liberty and property of the petitioner at the hands of respondent No.6. Learned State counsel submits that petitioner’s representation, Annexure P-2 had been enquired into and decided. Vide report dated 21.05.2026 of Superintendent of Police, Abohar, application of private respondent No.6 was consigned to the records and the enquiry report was approved by SSP, Fazilka. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner’s grievance was redressed and no further relief is sought. The petition accordingly stands disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 02.09.2026
JUDGE
Jyoti-V i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No JYOTI 2026.09.02 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document