Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/9044/2026 of RAHUL SAINI Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 111 CRWP-9044-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2026 RAHUL SAINI ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision: 02.09.2026

RAHUL SAINI

... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

... RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:

Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to take immediate and effective action for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner from respondents No.4 to 6 and further issuance of directions to decide representation dated 23.07.2026 submitted by the petitioner.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner submitted a representation dated 23.07.2026 to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Mahendergarh, and he would be satisfied if appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide representation dated 23.07.2026 moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law.

3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.02 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

4. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, Addl. A.G. Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits the needful would be done in due course.

5. Keeping in view the prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the aforesaid representation dated 23.07.2026 submitted by petitioner in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required.

6. However, if, respondent No. 2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law.

7. Petition stands disposed of.

8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 02.09.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.02 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead