Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/47976/2025 of RACHNEET KAUR JAGGI ALIAS RACHNEET KAUR Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 27 August 2026
1111 111144445555 IIIINNNN TTTTHHHHEEEE HHHHIIIIGGGGHHHH CCCCOOOOUUUURRRRTTTT OOOOFFFF PPPPUUUUNNNNJJJJAAAABBBB AAAANNNNDDDD HHHHAAAARRRRYYYYAAAANNNNAAAA AAAATTTT CCCCHHHHAAAANNNNDDDDIIIIGGGGAAAARRRRHHHH CCCCRRRRMMMM----MMMM----44447777999977776666----2222000022225555
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-47976-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 27.08.2026
RACHNEET KAUR JAGGI ALIAS RACHNEET KAUR
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
... RESPONDENT
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:-
Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, A.A.G., Haryana.
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the first petition for seeking regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 (U/s 439 Cr.P.C.) in FIR No.306 dated 16.09.2024 registered under Sections 120-B, 406 and 420 of IPC at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the FIR has been registered at the instance of complainant Sukhwant Singh. It was alleged by the complainant that his nephew Paras Singh was willing to go abroad, and for that purpose, he came into contact with Vishwas Group chaired by Parshottam Bhatti. Parshottam Bhatti and the petitioner convinced the nephew of complainant that they will arrange a study Visa for him for England, and that in the name of study Visa a sum of Rs. 17,25,000/- was received by the petitioner and her co-accused Parshottam Bhatti, but later on they failed to meet their commitment and thus, committed fraud with the JANKI BHATT 2026.09.01 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document complainant.
3. Vide order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court, petitioner was released on interim bail for a period of three months from the date of furnishing bail bonds before the learned trial Court. It was further ordered that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds shall ensure that a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- is paid by the petitioner to the complainant. Once the petitioner is released on bail, the petitioner and the complainant will have to appear before the Mediator to be appointed by High Court Legal Services Committee on 16.02.2026.
4. Pursuant to the order dated 20.01.2026, parties have appeared before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and a report has been received from the Mediator that the parties have settled their dispute by way of amicable settlement/agreement.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed. The interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 20.01.2026 is hereby made absolute on the same bail bonds. The petitioner need not to furnish the fresh bail bonds.
6. The parties are at liberty to move appropriate application for quashing the FIR in question.
7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(H.S.GREWAL) 27.08.2026
JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.09.01 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document