Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/32737/2026 of ANIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER on 27 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209209209209 CRMCRMCRMCRM----MMMM----32737327373273732737----2026202620262026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 ANIL KUMARANIL KUMARANIL KUMARANIL KUMAR ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHERSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHERSTATE OF HARYANA AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM
CRM
CRM
CRM-M-32737
32737-2026
Date of Decision: 27.08.2026
ANIL KUMAR
ANIL KUMAR
ANIL KUMAR
ANIL KUMAR
....Petitioner
V/s
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
....RespondentS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr.Virender Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana.
Mr.Ashish Sindher, Advocate for respondent No.2.
*****
H.
H.
H.
H.S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 438 Cr.P.C.) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.469 dated 24.06.2024 registered under Sections 406, 420, 506, 34 IPC (Corresponding to Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS), Section 24 of the Immigration Act, at Police Station Assandh, District Karnal.
2. This Court, vide order dated 07.07.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of his arrest, he was ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). POONAM RATHORE 2026.08.31 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-32737
32737-2026
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 07.07.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation.
4. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further custodial interrogation.
5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 07.07.2026 is made made made made absolute absolute absolute absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
6. However, it is clarified that the investigating authority on addition of an offence or offences may not proceed to arrest the accused/petitioner, but for arresting the accused/petitioner on such addition of offence or offences it needs to obtain an order to arrest the accused/petitioners from the Court which had granted the bail in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sumit Vs State of Sumit Vs State of Sumit Vs State of Sumit Vs State of U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. and Another and Another and Another and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026 Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026 Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026 Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE August 27, 2026 poonam
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable?
: Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2026.08.31 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document