Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/37867/2026 of HARMANDEEP SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 27 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (101) CRM-M-37867-2026 Date of Decision:-27.08.2026 HARMANDEEP SINGH … Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision:-27.08.2026
HARMANDEEP SINGH
… Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J
. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the first petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 438 Cr.P.C.) seeking the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.153, Dated 05.06.2026, registered under Sections 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (earlier Section 307 IPC 1860) and Section 25, 27 of Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station City Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran.
2. This Court, vide order dated 15.07.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of their arrest, he was ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating/Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.).
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order of this Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation on 20.07.2026. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.08.27 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
4. Learned State counsel states on instructions from ASI- Satnam Singh, that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Recovery of car and one pistol has been effected and petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation
5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 15.07.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 27th August, 2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.08.27 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document