Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/10213/2026 of KIRANDEEP KAUR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 27 August 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10213-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 KIRANDEEP KAUR ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Roshandeep Singh,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-10213-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 KIRANDEEP KAUR
... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab.
**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and to restrain the private respondent Nos.4 to 6 not to harass or interfere in the life of the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was married to Ghola Singh son of Manga Singh (respondent No.4) who passed away on 01.05.2026. After the death of their son, the private respondents are repeatedly threatening the petitioner that they would forcibly take away her minor son from her custody. Therefore, directions be issued to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her minor son.
3. The learned counsel for the State, on instructions, submits that though the petitioner has got recorded her statement during the course of the inquiry/investigation, respondent Nos.4 to 6 have blatantly refused to VISHAL SETHI 2026.08.27 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-10213-2026
make any statement to the Investigating Agency regarding the allegations levelled in the present petition.
4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to ensure the protection of the life and liberty of the petitioner particularly with respect to the custody of the minor child namely Abhishek, who is in the care and custody of the petitioner.
5. Disposed of.
6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE August 27, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.08.27 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document