Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/38475/2026 of KULDEEP & ORS Vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS on 27 August 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (137) CRM-M-38475-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-27.08.2026 KULDEEP AND OTHERS … Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, Advocate for the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(137)
CRM-M-38475-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-27.08.2026
KULDEEP AND OTHERS
… Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, Addl. AG Haryana.
Mr. Vikram Lakhlan, Advocate
for respondent No.4 to 6.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J
. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to earlier Section 482 Cr.P.C.) has been filed with a prayer for quashing of FIR No.303 dated 09.12.2025 registered under Sections 310(1), 310(2), 324(4) and 61(2) of the BNS, 2023 corresponding Sections 391, 395, 427, 120B IPC registered at P.S. Sadar, District Palwal, Haryana and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 04.06.2026 (Annexure P-2).
2. Vide order dated 16.07.2026, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise.
3. Report has since been received from learned District and Sessions Judge, Palwal, in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.08.27 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondents have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused- petitioners is quashed.
4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties along with its report.
5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and filed status report by way of an affidavit, which is taken on record.
6. In view of the report of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Palwal, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it qua petitioners, are hereby quashed.
7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below.
8. Petition stands disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 27th August, 2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.08.27 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document