Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/4544/2026 of HARJEET ALIAS RANJEET KAUR ALIAS RANO AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER on 27 August 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-4544-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 HARJEET ALIAS RANJEET KAUR ALIAS RANO AND OTHERS ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Ms. Dilpreet, Advocate for Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-4544-2026
Date of Decision: 27.08.2026
HARJEET ALIAS RANJEET KAUR ALIAS RANO AND OTHERS
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present:
Ms. Dilpreet, Advocate for
Mr. Manoj Pundir, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Puneet Munjal, Advocate
for the complainant.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)
On 28.01.2026 the following order was passed:- “By way of filing present petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners have sought quashing of FIR No.0080 dated 12.02.2025 under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC registered at Police Station Assandh, District Karnal (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings on the basis of compromise dated 21.01.2026 (Annexure P-2).
Notice of motion.
Mr. Sunny Namdev, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and prays for some time to seek instructions.
On the other hand, Ms. Dilpreet, Advocate enters appearance, files power of attorney on behalf of respondent No.2-Complainant and admits the factum of compromise.
In light of the above, the parties are directed to appear before the trial Court within a period of four weeks from today for getting their statements recorded qua the compromise and the trial Court is directed to send its report with regard to the following effects:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The number of accused in the present case.
2. Whether any accused has been declared proclaimed person or proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. are going on against any accused or not.
3. The name of complainant/injured if any or whether all of them have made their statements qua compromise.
4. The stage of trial/proceedings.
5. Whether the compromise is genuine, voluntary and out of free will of the parties. Report of trial Court be awaited for 11.05.2026.”
2. Thereafter, on 11.05.2026, the following order was passed: “On 28.01.2026, the parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court, to get their statements recorded with regard to the compromise, if any. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the parties could not appear before the Court below to get their respective statements recorded and he, thus, prays that one more opportunity be granted to the parties to do the needful. Adjourned to 27.08.2026. In the meantime, the parties are again directed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statement with regard to the compromise on 16.07.2026 by moving an appropriate application or by presenting this order, in terms of the order dated 28.01.2026 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court”
3. Despite the passing of the aforementioned orders, none of the parties have appeared to get their statements recorded in support of compromise.
4. Faced with this situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wishes to withdraw the present petition at this stage.
5. Ordered accordingly.
6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE August 27, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No