Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/9226/2026 of RAM PAL Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 27 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205205205205 CRMCRMCRMCRM----MMMM----9226922692269226----2020202026262626 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 RAM PALRAM PALRAM PALRAM PAL ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF HARYANASTATE OF HARYANASTATE OF HARYANASTATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM
CRM
CRM
CRM-M-9226
9226-20
Date of Decision: 27.08.2026
RAM PAL
RAM PAL
RAM PAL
RAM PAL
....Petitioner
V/s
STATE OF HARYANA
STATE OF HARYANA
STATE OF HARYANA
STATE OF HARYANA
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Suraj Mandhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana.
*****
H.
H.
H.
H.S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 438 Cr.P.C.) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.296 dated 04.06.2023 registered under Sections 406, 418, 419 and 420 of the IPC (Sections 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC added later on), at Police Station Krishna Gate, Thanesar District Kurukshetra.
2. This Court, vide order dated 08.07.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of his arrest, he was ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.).
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 08.07.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation. POONAM RATHORE 2026.08.31 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-9226
9226-20
4. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further custodial interrogation.
5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 08.07.2026 is made made made made absolute absolute absolute absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
6. However, it is clarified that the investigating authority on addition of an offence or offences may not proceed to arrest the accused/petitioner, but for arresting the accused/petitioner on such addition of offence or offences it needs to obtain an order to arrest the accused/petitioners from the Court which had granted the bail in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sumit Vs State of Sumit Vs State of Sumit Vs State of Sumit Vs State of U.P. and Another U.P. and Another U.P. and Another U.P. and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026 Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026 Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026 Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE August 27, 2026 poonam
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable?
: Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2026.08.31 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document