Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/71226/2025 of RICKY AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 27 August 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-71226-2025 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 RICKY AND OTHERS ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Ritesh Tomar, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Diya Sodhi,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-71226-2025 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 RICKY AND OTHERS
... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Ritesh Tomar, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Rahuldeep Singh Randhawa, Advocate for respondent No.2.
**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.466 dated 13.11.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Sector-8, District Faridabad and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 04.12.2025 (Annexure P-2). Vide order dated 17.12.2025 this Court had directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in terms of certain parameters given in the aforesaid order dated 17.12.2025 with regard to the compromise (Annexure P-2). In terms of the order dated 17.12.2025 passed by this Court parties have appeared before the court of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad, and as per the report dated 23.04.2026, submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. VISHAL SETHI 2026.08.31 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-71226-2025
A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543. In view of the aforesaid report of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad accompanied by the joint statement of both the parties, the present FIR No.466 dated 13.11.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Sector-8, District Faridabad and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners herein. Petition stands disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE August 27, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.08.31 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document