Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/24860/2026 of KRISH AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 27 August 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (136) CRM-M-24860-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-27.08.2026 KRISH AND OTHERS … Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Mohit Punia, Advocate, for Mr. Jaininder
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(136)
CRM-M-24860-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-27.08.2026
KRISH AND OTHERS
… Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
Mr. Mohit Punia, Advocate, for
Mr. Jaininder Saini, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate,
for respondents Nos.2 and 4.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J
. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant petition has been under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of FIR No. 80 dated 14.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 351(3), 191(2), 190, 126, 115 of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Barwala, District Hisar with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 29.04.2026 (Annexure P-2).
2. Vide order dated 02.07.2026, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise.
3. Report has since been received from learned District and Sessions Judge, Hisar, in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.08.27 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondents have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused- petitioners is quashed.
4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties along with its report.
5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners.
6. In view of the report of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Hisar, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it qua petitioners, are hereby quashed.
7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below.
8. Petition stands disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 27th August, 2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.08.27 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document