Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/32613/2026 of ROHIT Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 27 August 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 CRM-M-32613-2026 ROHIT .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT DATE OF DECISION: 27.08.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 27.08.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215
CRM-M-32613-2026
ROHIT
.....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA
.....RESPONDENT DATE OF DECISION: 27.08.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 27.08.2026
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Senior DAG, Haryana. ….. SUMEET GOEL
, J (ORAL)
Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.8 dated 13.01.2026 under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of BNS and Section 66 D of IT Act, registered at Police Station Cyber Crime (West), Gurugram, Haryana. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand at this stage. Ordered accordingly. Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to revisit this Court, by way of a separate petition, in case there is no substantial progress in the trial after a period of two months.
(SUMEET GOEL) 27.08.2026
JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2026.08.27 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document