Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/10339/2026 of MANI KUMAR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 27 August 2026
ooooffff 2222000022226666 ((((OOOO&&&&MMMM)))) ----2222---- 3. Learned state counsel on instructions from Inspector SHO Gaganpreet Singh submits that on one occasion petitioner's house was raided by the police in order to trace the whereabouts of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
REEMA SAINI 2026.08.27 19:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh
CRWP-10339 of 2026 (O&M) -2-
3. Learned state counsel on instructions from Inspector SHO Gaganpreet Singh submits that on one occasion petitioner's house was raided by the police in order to trace the whereabouts of brother of the petitioner, accused in the FIR. Petitioner was not wanted in the said FIR and would not be called.
4. In view of response of learned State counsel, no directions are required to be issued.
5. Disposed of. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE 27.08.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No REEMA SAINI 2026.08.27 19:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh